The streetscape renovation on River Street has opened to mixed
reviews. Most agree that this
project accomplished a much-needed renovation; however I have heard a number of
concerns:
·
Batavia spent far more of its TIF funds than planned,
which will hurt its ability to improve other targeted areas.
·
The remodeling resulted in a reduction of
parking in an area that already lacked adequate parking.
·
The parking is confusing: It is difficult to
identify where the parking actually is allowed and has resulted in vehicles
being ticketed or blocking through traffic.
·
Batavia City Council hired design consultants
without seeking proposals from qualified local professionals. This alienated local design firms who
have now missed an opportunity to contribute within their own community.
The city council
is about to approve a design for the crowning piece of the project: the decorative
entry arch. What began as a line
item budgeted at $55,000 was then increased to $90,000 in June, 2012. That cost has now risen to
approximately $120,000 when professional design fees and lighting are
included. Below is a rendering of
the proposed arch.
As an architect, I am
respectful of the efforts of other architects and designer professionals
I have tried to
remain open about this arch design.
I have reviewed the drawings and the 3D images several times.
To call this
structure an arch is not accurate. The design is more of a tiara, an intricate halo, 30-feet
in diameter, hovering14-feet above the street. It is supported from cables suspended from a heavy timber
structure.
I don’t think this design is
successful. The timber and steel design does not fit contextually with Batavia’s
historic surroundings, nor does it represent Batavia’s future. It is an
expensive, garish structure.
I think we can better spend $120,000
of Batavian’s tax dollars elsewhere.
Or not at all.